Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Ok, I get It Now!


1 comment:

  1. This one fought me a bit more than some. The composition of the final version was a bear because of the volume of content, but I like how it turned out. Plus, for me, it covers everything important about sophisticates theology.
    ---------------------------------------------
    Related to this panel, I loved a comment by _DiscoveredJoys_
    over at WEIT on this topic.

    "I think there is a reasonable argument that if you know of no evidence for god(s) then there is no need for a philosophy to explain that.

    You only need philosophy to grapple with the contradictions of believing in something even though no evidence exists."

    The most succinct appraisal of the issue I believe I have ever read.

    ReplyDelete