This one fought me a bit more than some. The composition of the final version was a bear because of the volume of content, but I like how it turned out. Plus, for me, it covers everything important about sophisticates theology. --------------------------------------------- Related to this panel, I loved a comment by _DiscoveredJoys_ over at WEIT on this topic.
"I think there is a reasonable argument that if you know of no evidence for god(s) then there is no need for a philosophy to explain that.
You only need philosophy to grapple with the contradictions of believing in something even though no evidence exists."
The most succinct appraisal of the issue I believe I have ever read.
This one fought me a bit more than some. The composition of the final version was a bear because of the volume of content, but I like how it turned out. Plus, for me, it covers everything important about sophisticates theology.
ReplyDelete---------------------------------------------
Related to this panel, I loved a comment by _DiscoveredJoys_
over at WEIT on this topic.
"I think there is a reasonable argument that if you know of no evidence for god(s) then there is no need for a philosophy to explain that.
You only need philosophy to grapple with the contradictions of believing in something even though no evidence exists."
The most succinct appraisal of the issue I believe I have ever read.